On 04/11/2014 09:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I agree Jon, but I think its me that needs to learn how 
> more than LCNC needs to be trained.
I had the capability of putting home switches on my machine from
the VERY beginning, but I was lazy, didn't quite know how it
was supposed to work, etc. etc.

I now KNOW I should have done it right after I moved to the 
original EMC!
It has saved me a fair amount of trouble by eliminating all 
those cases
where the placement of the part would have run me out of 
travel in
some direction.  Now, when I LOAD the part program, I get a 
message
about the limit that WOULD be exceeded if I HAD run the program.
> I seem to have stirred up a tempest that has escaped the 
> teapot, and I am almost sorry I did, but the discussion 
> that has followed has also been quite educational. Most 
> obvious is that I have some concepts about homing and 
> limits that I need to unlearn & learn better.
Yes, there are TWO coordinate systems.  One is the machine's 
coordinates,
and the axis travel limits are in that system, referenced to 
the machine
home position.

Then, there is the work coordinate system.  These systems 
are linked together
with some offset when you do the touchoff function.  You 
just bring the
tool down to within an umpteenth, like a thickness of paper 
and then
hit touchoff and enter .005 or whatever the thickness of the 
paper
is.

if you have a QC toolpost, you can enter all the offsets 
between your
standard tools, and then when you touchoff one tool to the work,
all the other tools are aligned to the workpiece ALSO, 
through the
tool offsets.

When you shutdown LinuxCNC, all these settings are saved, 
and when
you home the machine tomorrow, everything is brought back in.
This would be especially helpful in the lathe's X axis, 
you'd never have
to mike a diameter again.

On the mill, I don't use the tool table much, as many things 
need drill
bits held in Jacobs chucks, so the tool length will never be the
same.  I could enter lengths for various end mills in end mill
holders, as their length is repeatable.  But, since I don't 
have an
auto tool changer, my work procedure is to mount a tool, fixture
up the first part, and do all workpieces on that tool, then 
mount
second tool, touch off, and run all the workpieces with the 2nd
tool, and repeat.  Usually you can swap the workpieces very 
quickly,
even faster than swapping tools.

On a lathe, however, swapping the workpieces may have problems
with repeatable position in the chuck, so you want to do all the
operations on each piece before removing it.

Jon



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to