Just a suggestion:
Just fancy, linuxcnc is the distribution and "linuxcnc-feature" is a
package of this distribution.
So they have to take care delivering a working package.
Would this be a approach?
g m
On 2015-09-14 19:43, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 9/14/15 10:54 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
>> If the goal is to have better online collaboration for this
>> linuxcnc-related project, I think at least some conderation should be
>> given to using github rather than hosting on git.linuxcnc.org.
> Managing this and other LinuxCNC add-ons as separate projects makes
> partial sense.
>
> On the plus side, it frees them from our somewhat plodding release schedule.
>
> On the minus side, it forces them to duplicate our
> build/test/release/distribution infrastructure, and forces us (their
> project and our project) to invent a new mechanism for collaborating
> (for example, getting their packages onto our repos & ISOs).
>
>
--
"In der Wissenschaft siegt nie eine neue Theorie,
nur ihre Gegner sterben nach und nach"
Max Planck
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
