On 10 October 2015 at 06:42, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > In setting up to use a charge pump, needed to insulate an output from the > fact that a 5i25, when lcnc isn't running, sets all outputs to inputs > and pulls them high.
I am still not convinced that a charge-pump is the only solution to this. > More important, the loadrt line cannot contain either a count= or a > names= number-of-the-beast control mechanism, its a show stopper syntax > error. Why do you need more than one charge-pump signal? Surely the single pulsing io line can fan-out to all the hardware it controls either in HAL or in copper? (Not that I see a good reason for charge_pump to be a singleton component, but it is explicitly created as one in the .comp file) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
