Hi, On Mittwoch, 1. April 2020, 22:05:01 CEST andy pugh wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 05:48, Reinhard <reinha...@schwarzrot-design.de> wrote: > > I added a F-word with a slow value (like F100) to the beginning and a > > faster one (like F400) to the end. Without changing the feed overwrite, > > the machine starts to run with F400 as feed limit - which is aparently > > wrong. > > Are you sure about this?
No! Andy, as always: you're right and I have to blame myself. I thought about the _huge_ bug from Chris description, but in reality the changes I made where above the fastest speed axis could run with. In 3D-chips is an feedfactor, which I did not change. So I was mocked by the nominal feed value, which is wrong. Now I changed feedfactor to 1 and put extremely different f-words into code ... ... with the result, that lc behaves as it should. And feedback of current feed in status message is correct already. So the f-code "bug" is a cosmetic misbehavior only. Puh - then there is lot of outstanding work which is quite more important like active g- and mcodes. cheers Reinhard _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
