I know I'm jumping in the middle of the conversation, but I can't see what other behavior would be desired.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:30 AM Stuart Stevenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have tried, without success, to convince a developer to add a switch to > the config file to enable/disable the "feature". I don't like this > behavior. I would always run with the feature disabled. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 8:26 AM Reinhard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > On Mittwoch, 15. April 2020, 15:00:38 CEST Stuart Stevenson wrote: > > > It sounds to me like you will run into a problem with G41/G42 ... > > > When using G41/G42, if the tool radius (plus any diameter/radius > > > modification for roughing) is not smaller than the programmed radius of > > the > > > corner LinuxCNC will give you an error code and will not run. > > > > Well, that is correct and expected behaviour. > > > > Of cause, if faking tool properties, linuxcnc should use the resulting > > properties to (re-)calculate the new toolpath. If that would not be the > > case, > > the support for faking tool properties would be useless. > > > > But tests with G43.1 gimme the hope, that linuxcnc already takes the fake > > values for path calculations. > > I will test that, when I have a new dev-box up and running. > > > > Reinhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-developers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
