I know I'm jumping in the middle of the conversation, but I can't see
what other behavior would be desired.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:30 AM Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have tried, without success, to convince a developer to add a switch to
> the config file to enable/disable the "feature". I don't like this
> behavior. I would always run with the feature disabled.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 8:26 AM Reinhard <reinha...@schwarzrot-design.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Mittwoch, 15. April 2020, 15:00:38 CEST Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > > It sounds to me like you will run into a problem with G41/G42 ...
> > > When using G41/G42, if the tool radius (plus any diameter/radius
> > > modification for roughing) is not smaller than the programmed radius of
> > the
> > > corner LinuxCNC will give you an error code and will not run.
> >
> > Well, that is correct and expected behaviour.
> >
> > Of cause, if faking tool properties, linuxcnc should use the resulting
> > properties to (re-)calculate the new toolpath. If that would not be the
> > case,
> > the support for faking tool properties would be useless.
> >
> > But tests with G43.1 gimme the hope, that linuxcnc already takes the fake
> > values for path calculations.
> > I will test that, when I have a new dev-box up and running.
> >
> > Reinhard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-developers mailing list
> > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to