> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2022 um 11:58 Uhr > Von: "Jérémie Tarot" <silopo...@gmail.com> > An: "EMC developers" <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required. > > Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 01:03, Rod Webster <r...@vehiclemods.net.au> a écrit : > > > > I'll just wait until you guys decide on a way forward and iff the offer we > > have is required. > > Perhaps the Github actions could be extended to build the 2.9 branch? > > I don't see what would prevent us to build whatever branches we'd want to !? > > > If that were possible, maybe the VM here does the RTAI build? > > That remains possible with the GitHub actions thanks to the > self-hosted runners feature: > https://github.com/actions/runner > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners > https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/docs/start/envlinux.md > > > I'm not sure git will host the resulting debs > > Sadly, the GitHub Packages feature only supports programming languages > modules packages. > This is why I looked for an hosting solution and found PackageCloud.io > which does just that. > > > but it might be worth mentioning the Open build Service I linked to earlier > > can be incorporated > > right into sources.list with the appropriate security keys. > > It is indeed ! Can't believe I didn't remember it and even that it > didn't pop up in the many searches I did :/ > This could actually be the best option to keep all builds (RTAI > included), as it looks like OBS supports custom-built containers and > VMs, and package hosting all in the same place. It may well be able to > build the live ISO too, but I'm still not sure about that... > It also supports GitHub integration via webhooks and status reporting, > as well as it is Open Source and self-hostable, and even available in > Debian... what else ?! :) > https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.scm_ci_workflow_integration.html > > OBS repositories could at least be mirrored/synced to > http://linuxcnc.org/dists/ if no more elegant solution is available > > WDYT ? > > PS: Brother projects like MesaCT, QtPyVCP, etc. packages could also be > built under LinuxCNC umbrella there too
I do not get all the details but I tend to think that an external build service would free energy for us to concentrate on LinuxCNC itself, so I am very much up for it. Best, Steffen _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
