That sounds awesome! Tuned in to hear what everyone else thinks! On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 3:40 PM Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2022 um 11:58 Uhr > > Von: "Jérémie Tarot" <silopo...@gmail.com> > > An: "EMC developers" <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required. > > > > Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 01:03, Rod Webster <r...@vehiclemods.net.au> a > écrit : > > > > > > I'll just wait until you guys decide on a way forward and iff the > offer we > > > have is required. > > > Perhaps the Github actions could be extended to build the 2.9 branch? > > > > I don't see what would prevent us to build whatever branches we'd want > to !? > > > > > If that were possible, maybe the VM here does the RTAI build? > > > > That remains possible with the GitHub actions thanks to the > > self-hosted runners feature: > > https://github.com/actions/runner > > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners > > https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/docs/start/envlinux.md > > > > > I'm not sure git will host the resulting debs > > > > Sadly, the GitHub Packages feature only supports programming languages > > modules packages. > > This is why I looked for an hosting solution and found PackageCloud.io > > which does just that. > > > > > but it might be worth mentioning the Open build Service I linked to > earlier can be incorporated > > > right into sources.list with the appropriate security keys. > > > > It is indeed ! Can't believe I didn't remember it and even that it > > didn't pop up in the many searches I did :/ > > This could actually be the best option to keep all builds (RTAI > > included), as it looks like OBS supports custom-built containers and > > VMs, and package hosting all in the same place. It may well be able to > > build the live ISO too, but I'm still not sure about that... > > It also supports GitHub integration via webhooks and status reporting, > > as well as it is Open Source and self-hostable, and even available in > > Debian... what else ?! :) > > > https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.scm_ci_workflow_integration.html > > > > OBS repositories could at least be mirrored/synced to > > http://linuxcnc.org/dists/ if no more elegant solution is available > > > > WDYT ? > > > > PS: Brother projects like MesaCT, QtPyVCP, etc. packages could also be > > built under LinuxCNC umbrella there too > > I do not get all the details but I tend to think that an external build > service would free energy for us to concentrate on LinuxCNC itself, so I am > very much up for it. > > Best, > Steffen > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
