I have, a few years ago, seen ferrite material that was extruded into
flexible hoses. Darned if I can remember what for. Came from one of the
shielding outfits like Chromerics or somebody. Potentially, that could  be
treaded over an antenna cable - but it was somewhat brittle if you whacked
it a good one. (Much like my dog)
Gary

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   ed.pr...@cubic.com [SMTP:ed.pr...@cubic.com]
        Sent:   Monday, November 16, 1998 8:32 AM
        To:     emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; randall.flind...@emulex.com;
Robert Bonsen
        Subject:        RE: ANSI C63.4 -- ferrites

        Bob:

        You stress the importance of discrete ferrite absorbers placed
closely along the antenna cable. The obvious extension of this thought is to
have a special antenna coaxial cable which has ferrite material continuously
distributed along its external surface.

        Is this a reasonable extrapolation of the discrete ferrites
technique? Or does there have to be at least some spacing between discrete
absorptive elements?

        If a continuous absorptive layer on a coax cable is a good idea,
then has anyone ever encountered such a cable?

        Might there be some practical way to fabricate a flexible "add-on"
absorptive sleeve, possibly like the urethane foam thermal barriers placed
on water and refrigerant pipes?

        Regards,

        Ed


        ------------------------
          From: Robert Bonsen <rbon...@orionscientific.com>
          Subject: RE: ANSI C63.4 -- ferrites
          Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:02:52 -0600 
          To: randall.flind...@emulex.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org


        > 
        > In my experience when doing testing of semi-anechoic chambers for
NSA
        > performance using ferrites is a must to avoid measurements being
influenced
        > by the vertical drop portion on both the transmit and receive end.
Using a
        > spacing of about half a foot inbetween individual ferrite beads
has worked
        > best for me. Especially in the lower frequencies, up to about
150MHz, the
        > effect of the cable drop on vertical pol measurements is
considerable
        > (sometimes more than 1.5 dB). Thus, in all the NSA test
specifications I
        > write, I insist on the use of ferrites. 
        > 
        > Of course, not using ferrites on the vertical cable drop allows a
chamber
        > tester to tweak the cables such that at a specific problem
frequency the
        > vertical cable drop portion acts as a reflector to reduce or
increase the
        > transmitted/received signal levels somewhat. This may bring a
chamber/OATS
        > in spec which really isn't. Or bring it out if the tester is not
aware of
        > the problem. 
        > 
        > For better repeatability and better NSA measurements, ferrites are
        > required. They do not make the cable totally RF-invisible but do
        > considerably reduce the influence of the cable on the
measurements.
        > 
        > Regards,
        > -Robert
        > 
        > Robert Bonsen
        > Principal Consultant
        > Orion Scientific
        > email: rbon...@orionscientific.com
        > URL:   http://www.orionscientific.com
        > phone: (512) 347 7393; FAX: (512) 328 9240
        > 
        > 
        > ---------
        > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
        > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        > quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
        > j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
        > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
        > 
        > 

        ---------------End of Original Message-----------------

        --------------------------
        Ed Price
        ed.pr...@cubic.com
        Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
        Cubic Defense Systems
        San Diego, CA.  USA
        619-505-2780
        Date: 11/16/1998
        Time: 08:32:01
        --------------------------



        ---------
        This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
        with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
        j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
        roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to