Dear Kyle,

I suppose that here is not in discussion the INSULATION RESISTANCE, I think
(as far as I know, Clause 16 from "IEC335-1, Safety of household and similar
electrical appliances, Part 1: General requirements", deals with the
ELECTRIC STRENGTH and LEAKAGE CURRENT...) 

The Table 5 of the Standard IEC335-1 gives the values of the TEST VOLTAGE
and the POINT OF APPLICATION. 

Compared with IEC 950, within IEC335-1 you may find the fact that the
required TEST VOLTAGE is higher than within IEC950 [e.g. between LIVE parts
and ACCESSIBLE PARTS IEC 335-1 is asking for 3750Vac/1min and
IEC950(IEC60950) is asking only for 3000Vac/1min...I suppose that here was
the difference and ...the failure...

Unfortunately I was not able to find the Clause 5.3.101 within the copy
which I have...and as well I did not find the Japanese deviations neither
under the country notes, nor under the legal requirements...

Respectfully yours,
Constantin 

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer.

Constantin Bolintineanu, P.Eng.
Product Safety Engineer
DIGITAL SECURITY CONTROLS LTD.
1645 FLINT Rd. TORONTO , ONTARIO, CANADA M3J 2J6
Phone: 1-416-665-8460 extension 2568
Fax:     1-416-665-7753 APPROVAL SERVICES
E-mail: [email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 11:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Insulation resistance



I just received an amended CB report for a product we make and I was
reviewing it and see that a 'fail' verdict was given for a deviation + test
in Sub-Clause 5.3.101 of the Japanese deviation to IEC 950.  A remark of
"Not evaluated as part of this investigation" also appears.  The text of the
Deviation + Test reads: "Add: The insulation resistance shall comply with
the requirements of Clauses 16.3 of IEC Publication 335-1 (1976) Second
Edition."

I use UL1950 2nd and 3Rd ed. and I cannot find this 5.3.101 reference in the
latest copy of the standard, much less IEC Pub 335-1.  If a customer put me
on the spot for this, I might need to test for it... Can someone educate me
on this?

Thank You.

Kyle Ehler  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
Assistant Design Engineer
LSI Logic Corporation


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to