Gail, and everyone

This seems most improbable to me, but just to be sure, I contacted the
Department of Trade & Industry here in the UK.  The person I contacted has
not heard anything to this effect either, but is checking where such a story
might have originated.

I will post further information as soon as I hear anything.

Best wishes

Brian Jones
EMC Consultant and Competent Body Signatory


-----Original Message-----
From: Gail Birdsall <gbird...@hach.com>
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 19 June 2000 19:40
Subject: SLIM


>
>
>
>
>Greetings Colleagues,
>
>We heard form a reliable source who attended the June meeting of the EU
>Commission on the SLIM Initiative, of discussions to limit the
certification
>of product family EMC standards to notified (competent?) bodies.  If this
is
>true, it would effectively close the self testing and  certification route
>for manufacturers required to test to product specific EMC Standards. We
>understand that, possibly the Generic Standards route would still be left
>open to manufacturers who wish to self declare.
>
>As you all know, currently where product specific standards exist, they
>supercede the Generic Standards.  My company has spent hundreds of thousand
>of dollars on EMC equipment and facilities to enable us to test and self
>declare our products.  We originally tested and certified to the Generic
>Emissions Immunity Standards, but have recently switched to EN61326:97
>AM1:98.  If the above action is true, it would seem to be big victory and
>financial windfall for EU test laboratories and designates.  At the same
>time, it would be a terrible blow to both EU and US manufacturers who
>invested heavily in test capability to self declare their products.
>
>Does anyone know of the validity of the SLIM action to require testing of
>product specific standards such as EN 61326 by Notified bodies?  It has
>always been my understanding that the SLIM Initiative was to make things
>easier not more complicated and expensive by requiring 3rd party testing.
>Can anyone tell me if it is truly the plan of the EU Commission to take
away
>self testing and declaration?  We have heard that the new EMC Directive
>incorporating the SLIM Initiative recommendations may be out as early as
the
>end of the year.
>
>Thank-you for your input/s
>
>Gail Birdsall
>Hach Co.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------
>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
>To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>     majord...@ieee.org
>with the single line:
>     unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
>For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>
>For policy questions, send mail to:
>     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org

Reply via email to