If this is becoming an issue, I would like to recommend that the Subject header in the e-mail be preceded by either "EMC:" or "SAF:" followed by the subject. This way, persons not interested in one or the other could easily delete the message without opening it. However, I would not like to see a split;-- there are many engineers that are responsible for both functions and, as mentioned previously, many safety issues could affect EMC, and vice versa.
And, into what category would you place requests for ALL regulatory requirements for different countries? Do we have to send such to three different addresses? Tania Grant, tgr...@lucent.com <mailto:tgr...@lucent.com> Lucent Technologies, Communications Applications Group ---------- From: Robert Legg [SMTP:rl...@tectrol.com] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 10:33 AM To: IEEE EMC-PSTC Forum Subject: EMC and product safety split? Is there any possibility of getting the EMC and product safety postings partitioned ~ to assist in cutting surplus mail traffic? Rob Legg rl...@tectrol.com ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
