Ted,

While most "alternative energy" schemes sound very promising, energy efficiency 
problems make most of them impractical for real world use. Small solar charging 
systems are great for maintaining a charge on a seldom used battery in a spare 
automobile, or similar application, but the ratio of charge time to usage has 
to be 
large. The problems with a solar powered automobile would be:

1) Lots of expensive (and unsightly) solar panels plus the numerous serial and 
parallel connections needed to make a usable system. Even then, the car would 
have to be parked in the sunlight many more hours than it was driven.

2) An expensive buck/boost charge controller to compensate for the enormous 
voltage variations due to weather.

3) A trunk full of heavy, expensive batteries, with their need to be eventually 
replaced.

4) And finally, how would the batteries be charged if it rained for four or 
five days 
straight?

The hybrid gas/electric vehicles seem to be the only practical electric 
vehicles made 
so far. And even these seem to be expensive enough that sales have to be 
subsidized.

I know people who have tried to use solar dc electrical systems at remote 
camps. 
You have to strictly ration electrical usage even if you only use the place on 
weekends after it has charged all week. Most people eventually revert to using 
combinations of propane, gasoline, and kerosene for light and cooking. A gallon 
of 
Coleman fuel will last a week running a stove and some lights.

As to the energy efficiency of gasoline, years ago I watched a demonstration 
where a 
homemade mortar lobbed a sand-filled beer can hundreds of yards using a 
SPOONFUL of gasoline! It graphically proved the point about why it is so hard 
to 
replace the internal combution engine.

Scott Lacey
On 7 Jun 2002 at 13:52, Ted Rook wrote:

> 
> sorry, off topic, mostly for US residents:
> 
> just imagine everyone's car being coated with 'solar cell generator'
> material with a storage device in the trunk......
> 
> and how about air-conditioners that run on the Stirling cycle from a
> solar energy collector...
> 
> lousy for the oil lobby but fantastic for the human race
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
>      Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
>     Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to