In a message dated 16/04/2003 21:23:18 GMT Daylight Time, dcerece...@pelco.com
writes:




David



The wiring regulations in Europe are based on a CENELEC Harmonised Document
(HD) rather than a European Norm (EN) and, as such, it is permissible for
requirements to vary from country-to-country in Europe to a much greater
extent than is the case for EN 60950, EN 60065, etc.  You may therefore find
that there is no single answer for the whole of Europe.

You say 'high voltage' - but that means different things to a logic designer
vs. a power utility engineer.  Certainly, in the UK it is not uncommon to run
backbone optical fibres in a spiral fashion around the earth return conductor
strung between  extra-high tension pylons.  However, that is a very special
application.

For mains and optical cables run in a single conduit it is necessary to
understand who could access (and damage accidentally) the electrical and
optical cables.  For instance, it is far from uncommon for underground cables
to be damaged by diggers repairing roads etc.  Normally, the repairing of
optical cables and electrical cables falls to two or more organisations who
have operatives specialised in optical safety and electrical safety
respectively.  Even if only one company is involved in maintaining/repairing
both optical and electrical cables, the personnel may well be different. Your
application may just be between two linked buildings or even within a single
room, but you should nevertheless consider this question.

So, are the high voltage cables double-insulated such that they could be
touched by untrained personnel?  If not, then re-splicing an optical fibre
could expose 'optical technicians' to unexpected and unacceptable electrical
safety hazards.

What is the optical power being transmitted down the fibre?  What is the
Hazard Level per IEC 60825-2 and would it be acceptable for the 'electrical
technicians' to be exposed to this radiation from broken fibres?

Within IEC TC76 (responsible for the optical safety standards - IEC 60825
series) and IEC TC 86C (responsible for fibre-optic cable standards) and the
ITU-T there has been discussion regarding potential fire hazards caused by the
transmission of high optical powers (e.g. in the order of 1W) under certain
circumstances. It is a theoretical possibility that a fault in a fibre
carrying high optical powers could burn the insulation off of electrical
cables carrying high electrical powers, thereby causing an electrical
short-circuit.  Whether this is the case for you at the moment is something
for you to determine - as is the possibility that it is relatively easy to
increase the transmitted optical power at some future date.

You also talk of optical fibres being insulating.  That may be so for certain
fibres, but it is also possible to get steel reinforced optical cables.  If
such optical cables are being used, is the insulation from the high voltage
conductors to the (hopefully, earthed) steel reinforcing cables adequate?

Of course, your application could just involve running double-insulated mains
cables and non-metallic fibres at both Class 1 (825-1) and Hazard Level 1
(825-2) in a single channel for a short run.  In such a case you may possible
conclude that the potential safety hazards have been reduced to a sufficiently
low level.

Regards,

Richard Hughes

Safety Answers Ltd. 







Reply via email to