I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <15.1ed64bf4.2d11f [email protected]>) about 'CTL Decisions (was: RE: MOV's to ground)' on Wed, 17 Dec 2003: > Brian, John, > > I personally think that the question of test house interpretations > has deviated from the original point, though I do agree that any > 'invisible' requirement is a bad thing. However, what is more > important to me is what we can do about it. > > In the above regard I have thus far seen no reaction to my earlier > contribution. Therefore I conclude that people are satisfied with > making statements in the knowledge that no action is going to > result, other than perhaps to elicit a "me to" response from > others. > > Controversially yours, > I was under the impression that you were extremely averse to controversy. It's out of season anyway. Nadolig llawen!
Anyway, I replied to Richard by e-mail, because UK national committee business is involved. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
