Good note Hans.  I stand corrected.

Brent


From: hansm [mailto:hans.mellb...@baclcorp.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:02 PM
To: Brent DeWitt; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: High Frequency Measurements



A bore sight antenna is implied in the rules and hence, the referenced
measurement procedure C63-4 (section 4.1.5.4) by requiring the "beam width"
and "coverage of the EUT" to be fully covered.


Hans Mellberg
Engineering Manager
BACL, a TCB and an EU CAB
230 Commercial Street
Sunnyvale CA 94085 USA
408-732-9162 x38
408-732-9164 fax


From: "Brent DeWitt" <bdew...@ix.netcom.com>
To: <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: High Frequency Measurements


>
> Height scanning at frequencies above 1 GHz is a serious mixed bag of
> effects.  Most folks use horns for the measurement antenna which increased
> the directivity, especially when compared to a LPDA.  This has been the
> argument for "bore-sighting" antenna masts which keep the major lobe of
the
> antenna aligned with the EUT.  Since bore-sighting isn't required, the
> manufacturer puts themselves at something of a disadvantage when trying to
> meet the spirit of the law rather than the letter of it.
>
> The second effect is the directivity of the EUT source.  If the EUT were
> isotropic in radiation pattern, then height scanning would be largely
> unnecessary, but this is not the case.  Apertures and aperture arrays can
be
> highly directive as frequencies go up.  For this reason alone, I believe
> height scanning is necessary to provide a complete picture of the EUT
> emissions.
>
> Brent DeWitt
> Loveland, CO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of rehel...@mmm.com
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:33 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: High Frequency Measurements
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Also above 1 GHz directivity comes more and more into play (another reason
> for hieght-scanning).
>
> Bob Heller
> 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
> St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
> Tel:  651- 778-6336
> Fax:  651-778-6252
> =======================================================
>
>
>
>                       "Luke Turnbull"
>                       <luke.turnb...@trw.com       To:
> <wizbc...@charter.net>
>                       >                              <emc-p...@ieee.org>
>                       Sent by:                     cc:
>                       owner-emc-pstc@majordo       Subject:  Re: High
> Frequency Measurements
>                       mo.ieee.org
>
>
>                       02/13/2004 03:34 AM
>                       Please respond to
>                       "Luke Turnbull"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The reason for height-scanning is that there are unavoidable reflections
> from the groundplane, and the only way to ensure that your measurement
> geometry is not causing a deep null is to scan the height.  The reason
that
> reflections are unavoidable is that at 30MHz, absorber would have to be
2.5
> m deep which is not practical or economic.k
>
> At frequencies above 1 GHz, absorber is practical and economic, and I is
> easy to put absorber on the ground to minimise the small effect that there
> might be on your measurement due to ground reflections, and not bother
with
> height scanning.
>
> Luke Turnbull
>
> >>> "Wiz" <wizbc...@charter.net> 12/02/2004 15:36:41 >>>
> Hello,
>
> I have a need to make radiated measurements up to 40 GHz.  I uses a low
> loss cable that gives me enough dynamic range up to 18GHz.  The cable is
> very short and I have to move my measurements equipment out to the
> antenna.  I know I need to get a pre-amp and mixer, but what do I do
> about the cable loss?  I have called many places and I cannot find good
> enough cable to measure to 40 GHz.  The other alternative is waveguides
> as I understand.  Those would, I assume, be coupled directly to the
> input of the mixer.  This does not allow for antenna height adjustments
> form 1 to 4m as required.  I have seen other test reports where high
> frequency data was taken where the antenna was held at about 1meter.  I
> can understand this since emissions will likely be very directional at
> those frequencies.  Is it acceptable to make measurements with the
> receive antenna at 1 meter only?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any information you can provide.
>
>
>
> Wiz
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
>      Dave Heald:               emc_p...@symbol.com
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
>      Dave Heald:               emc_p...@symbol.com
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
>      Dave Heald:               emc_p...@symbol.com
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to