In article <bdcd0340.19c70%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> writes >Yes, these are conducted emissions. I used a pair of 50 uH, 50 Ohm >LISNs designed as far as I know to CISPR 16. A spectrum analyzer swept >from 0.5 - 3.5 MHz using a 9 kHz rbw with no video averaging >(initially). I did not check what the quasi-peak detector read. The >set-up did not perfectly replicate CISPR 22 or ANSI C63 methods, but at >these frequencies I judged the discrepancies to be insignificant.
Thanks. Meanwhile here in Yoorup, the authorities are agitating about emissions from CFLs above 30 MHz! Something about motes and beams comes to mind, but it's not an exact match, despite the opportunities for puns. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
