Yes, these are conducted emissions.  I used a pair of 50 uH, 50 Ohm LISNs
designed as far as I know to CISPR 16.  A spectrum analyzer swept from 0.5 -
3.5 MHz using a 9 kHz rbw with no video averaging (initially).  I did not
check what the quasi-peak detector read.  The set-up did not perfectly
replicate CISPR 22 or ANSI C63 methods, but at these frequencies I judged
the discrepancies to be insignificant.

> From: John Woodgate <j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk>
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:36:01 +0000
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: fluorescent lamp rfi
>
> In article <bdcbdbe5.19b9d%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, Ken Javor
> <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> writes
>> I made some AM band measurements, peak detection:
>>
>> Freq    Ampl.
>> MHz     dBuV
>> 0.45    98
>> 0.55    94
>> 0.63    92
>> 0.75    90
>> 0.83    86
>> 0.88    83
>> 0.94    82
>> 1       78
>> 1.2     73
>> 1.4     72
>> 1.54    70
>> 1.61    68
>> 1.68    67
>> 1.73    69
>>
>> These were rectification harmonics.  If I turned on video averaging,
>> they went away and left a nice spectrum of some cw switching activity at
>> a much lower level.  It is the rectification harmonics, not the
>> switcher, that causes the problem.  BTW, the noise was pure differential
>> mode - there was no common mode component, which is to be expected for
>> this two wire topology.
>
> I suppose these are conducted emissions, measured according to CISPR 15.
> But these lamps are subject only to the 'insertion loss' measurement
> described in clause 7.
>
> Someone has left out the capacitors across the rectifier diodes, or used
> cheap diodes instead of the special ones that don't produce as much r.f.
> --
> Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
> The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
> The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
> http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
>
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
> Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
> Scott Douglas             emcp...@ptcnh.net
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>
> Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
> Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Scott Douglas             emcp...@ptcnh.net

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to