But we are not talking about electromagnetism, we are talking about 
electromagnetic compatibility which is a very different problem. You 
cannot ignore the political and economic factors which are not so 
easy to describe mathematically as the electromagnetism.

Your second paragraph is factually correct, but in fact is about as 
much use as trying to use relativistic space-time theory as the basis 
of deciding a policy on dealing with speeding offences.

Respectfully!

Nick.



At 1:39 pm -0500 14/7/05, Ken Javor wrote:
>When solving a problem in electromagnetism, we start with absolutes, they
>are known as Maxwell's equations.  In order to provide a meaningful answer,
>the equations must be evaluated taking into account the salient boundary
>conditions.
>
>The fact that the solution depends on the boundary conditions does not
>invalidate the fundamental equations which describe the behavior of
>electromagnetic phenomena.
>
>>  From: John Woodgate <[email protected]>
>>  Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:20:30 +0100
>>  To: [email protected]
>>  Subject: Re: EMC Ethics
>>
>>  McInturff Gary <[email protected]> wrote (in
>>  <[email protected]>) about
>>  'EMC Ethics', on Thu, 14 Jul 2005:
>>
>>>  This brings up the issue of "situational ethics".  Is it any more
>>>  ethical to be just a little bit wrong for just a short time
>>
>>  Yes.
>>
>>>  than it is to just ignore the issue and try to do better some time when
>>>  its more convenient?
>>
>>  No.
>>
>>>  I'm voting no on that. I suppose the risk was mitigated but not sure
>>>  the ethics of the situation were affected.
>>
>>  Once you bring 'absolutes' into the mix, you leave the real world at
>>  high speed.
>>
>>  Do doctors always tell the whole truth to patients? Do lawyers ever use
>>  theatrical methods to convince juries?
>>  --
>  > Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
>>  Deadlines are 90% of deadliness.
>  > http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
>>


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas             [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell            [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to