Does this mean that there is a 61326-2-1 and 61326-2-2 floating around
somewhere? Is there a method to the numbering?
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=========================
John Woodgate
<[email protected]
o.uk> To
Sent by:
owner-emc-pstc@ie cc
ee.org
Subject
Re: IEC 61326-2-3
07/27/2005 05:25
AM
"Gordon,Ian" <[email protected]> wrote (in
<e1ba0362b28ed211a1e80008c71ea30603387...@z-160-100-30-252.est.ibm.com>)
about 'IEC 61326-2-3', on Wed, 27 Jul 2005:
>Does anybody have any information on this new standard? Particularly,
>will this be another standard which we should apply to equipment in
>addition to EN61326:1997 (once it is adopted by CENELEC and published
>in the OJ)? There is already an amendment which relates to "performance
>criteria for transducers with integrated or remote signal conditioning"
>( Annex F of EN61326:1997) and this is the title of the new standard,
>IEC 61326-2-3. Thanks.
From the public part of the IEC web site:
Project : IEC 61326-2-3 Ed. 1.0
Committee 65A Current document 65A/433/CDV Current status ADIS -
Approved for FDIS circulation
History Associated Documents
Title:
Electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use - EMC
requirements - Part 2-3: Particular requirements - Test configuration,
operational conditions and performance criteria for transducers with
integrated or remote signal conditioning
HISTORY OF THE PROJECT
Stage Document Date Target Date
AMW 65A/364/MCR 28 June 2002
CCDV 65A/433/CDV 21 January 2005 30 November 2004
ADIS 65A/451/RVC 8 July 2005 30 September 2005
DEC 30 November 2005
ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS :
65A/404/INF
What has probably happened is that the splitting up of IEC 61326 into a
multi-part standard has resulted in the original Annex F being elevated
to a Section of Part 2. But it may have changed in the process.
The standard is almost certainly dual-voted in IEC and CENELEC and if so
will result in a new edition of EN 61326, split up into Parts and
Sections, with the usual 3 year transition period.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
Deadlines are 90% of deadliness.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
