In message <b4898cd034fea54fb0fb09d0be5a10fc788...@lhr1exch2.aspect.com>, dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006, "Richards, Carl" <carl.richa...@aspect.com> writes >1. A modification made to an approved product without notification to >UL of the change; and with the intent of not applying the UL mark when >shipping the product > >2. A manufacturer certified to perform their own UL compliance subject >to verification by UL, can the manufacturer build systems while waiting >for final approvals; and would it be possible for the manufacturer to >build and ship such a product without applying the UL mark?
In both cases, if the UL mark is not applied, UL has no interest in the product. So you can build and ship; whether the buyer will accept those products is a non-technical question. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
