In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 26 Jun 2007, "Tyra, John" <[email protected]> writes:
>There are standard changes being proposed, and in the works driven by >the U.S. State Fire Marshals, to protect against external flame sources >like candles where a 94-V0 fire enclosure may be required if adopted... This is indeed being implemented as IEC TS 62441 (not without much controversy), to be normatively referenced in IEC 60065, but only for TV sets. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
