Hello Joel,

The ground connection is treated differently from other terminals because
of what happens if it fails.

If a line connection comes loose, there should be some indication of a
problem.  The equipment will likely not operate properly or it will operate
at a reduced capacity of some type.  The earthed chassis of Class I
equipment, or the double insulation of Class II equipment will protect the
user from this failure.  The indication of the problem should prompt the
user to remove the product from service for repair.  I realize that this
doesn't always happen, but at least the user has been given some indication
that there is a problem and it is now up to them to take action.

If a ground connection fails, there will be no indication of a problem to
the user.  The product will likely continue to operate perfectly normally.
A second failure, such as a loose line wire, could lead to the sudden and
unexpected energizing of exposed metal.  The product has now become
hazardous without warning.

I know that this is a generalization and we don't live in an ideal world.
However, it is based on the concept of risk reduction.  Adding a
supplementary retention method to a ground connection can provide an
additional level of safety.

Ted Eckert
American Power Conversion/MGE
http://www.apc.com/

The items contained in this e-mail reflect the personal opinions of the
writer and are only provided for the assistance of the reader. The writer
is not speaking in an official capacity for APC-MGE or Schneider Electric.
The speaker does not represent APC-MGE's or Schneider Electric's official
position on any matter.


                                                                           
             Joel Sandberg                                                 
             <jbsandtech@yahoo                                             
             .com>                                                      To 
             Sent by:                  emc-p...@ieee.org                   
             emc-p...@ieee.org                                          cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             03/16/2008 09:36          Protective Earthing Terminal        
             PM                        Construction Requirements           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




To Members of the Product Safety Group;

I am trying to find the construction requirements, and the standards that
set these requirements, for a protective earth(ing) terminal.

Many of us have learned that there needs to be locking washers and nuts
between each ring lug.  But where is this actually called out and required?

I am trying to show the engineering department were I work which parts of
this "good practice" are actually requirements of the requirements we will
be claiming to meet.

I have found a diagram at www.phihong/html/grounding.html (Phihong.com)
that shows reasonable grounding technique.  But this web site does not site
any standard as a basis for the technique.

I have searched 60601-1:1988 and 60950:95 looking for requirements and a
diagram.  I have found resistance requirements, 0.1 ohm max in 60601-1,
section 18 f), but I can not find construction explicit requirements.

Does anyone know if any standard includes explicit construction
requirements for a protective earth terminal and for connections to a PE
terminal?

Thank you.

Joel Sandberg
Lake Worth, FL





 Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html


For help, send mail to the list administrators:


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org


For policy questions, send mail to:


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to