On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:00:28 +0100, John Woodgate <j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <elvaa7la5l74q8p95vgbo2no8l8cddh...@4ax.com>, dated Mon, 24 > Oct 2011, Pat Lawler <pat.law...@verizon.net> writes: > > >Consider testing at 3 A/m *and* 1 Gauss (80 A/m) in case the higher > >test level is needed. > > What would 80 A/m at 150 Hz or 180 Hz be simulating? It's also very odd > that one level is in A/m and the other in the CGS unit - not tesla. Use of the unit "gauss" mixed with "A/m" in the same sentense, funny syntax of the phase (no "and" between "...3 A/m" and "magnetic...") and the level of 1 gauss - all suggested me something is wrong. But I though maybe I'm misreading something, as it seems too funny and I could find no corrigendum (if it is simple editorial error, it should able to be fixed soon, I thought) issued in these ten years. I'll discuss that with my client, but if he insist to test his equipment for 80 A/m at 150/180Hz, will do the test. Thanks. Regards, Tom -- Tomonori Sato <vef00...@nifty.ne.jp> URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/ - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
