In message <elvaa7la5l74q8p95vgbo2no8l8cddh...@4ax.com>, dated Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Pat Lawler <pat.law...@verizon.net> writes:
>Consider testing at 3 A/m *and* 1 Gauss (80 A/m) in case the higher >test level is needed. What would 80 A/m at 150 Hz or 180 Hz be simulating? It's also very odd that one level is in A/m and the other in the CGS unit - not tesla. One begins to wonder what the Central Office editors are allowed to do these days. They used to be hot on this sort of whimsy. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of biting a rook. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
