Amund

Yes it is fair. UL 497 is a Standard for Protectors for Paired Conductor 
Communication Circuits. Assuming your device was tested to that standard and 
outdoor usage, the North American NEMA environmental protection requirements 
have been applied which are different than the IEC environmental protection 
requirements. 

Even if you do succeed obtaining the UL report, I think your third party 
certification body will find that additional testing will be required to meet 
the IEC 60950-22 environmental protection requirements.

Best Regards

Peter Merguerian
[email protected]
Go Global Compliance Inc.
Tel: (408) 416-3772
Cel: (408) 931-3303
www.globalcompliance.blogspot.com

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:22 AM, "Amund Westin" <[email protected]> wrote:



        A third part certification body shall issue a CE statement for our ITE. 
Such a statement helps us a lot even outside the European Union.

         

        The certification body ask for documentation which justifies that our 
rubber gasket (seal the box and lid in our outdoor ITE), complies with the 
requirements in IEC60950-22 (Information technology equipment Safety Part 22: 
Equipment to be installed outdoors).

         

        So far, we have just given the body the reference to the UL online 
certification directory which refer it to the UL497 standard.

        The certification body ask for the UL test report as well, which I 
assume can be difficult to get.

         

        Question:

        I admit that a certification body can ask for any kind of documentation 
as long as we talk about  voluntary certification.

        But is it “fair” to ask for test reports when a certificate / listing 
is in place?

         

        Regards

        Amund

         

        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to < 
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
<http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc> 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 

        Website: <http://www.ieee-pses.org/> http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions: <http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html> 
http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: <http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html> 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas < <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
        David Heald < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to