Hi All, I've not paid much attention to this so far because I was working... shame on me.
It just so happens I have in the lab right now a high end cocker ( Range to the US folks ). This rascle has 2 microprocessors, to improve safely I'm told. It seems like the homework has been done, since it passed all tests at level 4. That was my clients request. The hardest thing we had was the clicks... Now when I saw the requirements ( cant remember which std ) it seamed like the EMC requirements were very low, BUT, there were additional safety requirements imposed separately. I wonder if the manufacturer only tested to the lowest requirements? Cheers, Derek. John Woodgate wrote: > In message > <de87437fe365cb458c265ea3d73b6f1d04d84...@xbc-mail1.xantrex.com>, > dated Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Ralph McDiarmid <ralph.mcdiar...@xantrex.com> > writes: > >> And why does a range, microwave oven or a toaster need a >> microprocessor in the first place? > > HERESY! (;-) - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
