Hi Neven,

I can also confirm that you should see a decrease in amplitude in peak mode for 
SS clocking. I use my simple handheld Thurlby Thander PSA2701T peak-reading 
spectrum analyzer to demo this during my EMC seminars.
_______________________
Kenneth Wyatt
Wyatt Technical Services LLC
Woodland Park, CO
Email Me! | Web Site | Blog
Subscribe to Newsletter
Connect with me on LinkedIn

On Feb 10, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Neven Pischl wrote:

> I would like to thank sincerely to all who responded, I appreciate it. I am 
> not going to react to any discussions on whether it is cheating or not :), it 
> was not anywhere in my mind when I posted the question and I hope this topic 
> does not degrade :).
>  
> But, I'd like to summarize a little:
>  
> 1. I do care about the Pk measurements, not only about QP and Avg, because 
> that is in the specs I am dealing with (some automotive emission requirements)
>  
> 2. I found out, as I suspected and was confirmed in some replies, that if I 
> change the modulating frequency up to over 20 kHz, then I see reduction with 
> 100/120kHz RBW also, not only with 1kHz RBW. Hence, there is an effect of the 
> modulating frequency and the RBW combination on the measured Pk results.
>  
> 3. SSC by using frequency modulation of the clock actually does reduce the 
> peak value. I have seen some replies saying it does not, and over many years 
> I have come across people who said the same. However, if you look in any 
> textbook on FM, you can see that - in the frequency domain - FM causes the 
> power of the carrier to be distributed into the side-bands, with the total 
> power the same with or without the modulation. Therefore, because the power 
> power stays the same, it must be that each of the components in the spectrum, 
> i.e. the carrier and the two side-lobes, must have a lower amplitude than the 
> unmodulated carrier. Please, do not confuse the individual amplitudes of 
> individual spectral components with the amplitude of the signal in the 
> time-domain, which indeed stays the same.
>  
> In case of a digital pulses, the "carrier" is the fundamental as well as each 
> of the harmonics.
>  
> Because of the above, and if you look with the infinitely small RBW (i.e. do 
> the math), SSC does indeed reduce the peak value of each harmonic (and 
> fundamental). BTW, the "speed" or modulating freqeuncy does not have a 
> bearing on the level of reduction of the peak values, in such an ideal case. 
> Only the modulatioin index (similar to "depth") is important, as it defines 
> how much power of the carrier is put into the side-lobes.
>  
> The issue I was facing was that under the test conditions of the EMC 
> specification I have to use a specified "wide" RBW. Under that condition, the 
> modulating frequency is important too - as I found out.
>  
>  
> Best regards to all,
>  
> Neven
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
> <emc-p...@ieee.org>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
> formats), large files, etc.
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to