I guess to measure the cost of compliance; you certainly need to understand
the cost of non-compliance.

Safety, with regard to reputation, conscience, law suits, sleeping well at
night, jail time, etc.
EMC and Radio, with regard to quality, reputation, harmony within society,
etc.

In the USA, Canada and Europe, I see very real examples of how poor
compliance rates do lead to a tightening in the requirements.
So, you could also consider it an investment.

Just a thought.   :-)

Michael.



Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] 
Sent: 30 March 2012 12:24
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] "Compliance costs too much."

I once worked with an EMC engineer who measured the performance of himself
and his time by the cost of the components that were used in the equipment
solely for the purpose of EMC control.

His objective was to reduce the cost of compliance by advising designers of
careful layout so as to minimize the need for EMC components.

Safety is a bit different because many safety components are also functional
components.
Nevertheless, a ground wire can be eliminated if double-insulation is
employed.  In this example, a cost trade-off between the power cord and the
extra insulation.  But, these days, most primary circuit designs are indeed
double-insulated as transformers simply don't use internal shields.

Enclosures... only needed for primary circuits and secondary circuits
exceeding 30 V.  (Yes, you still want an enclosure, but not for safety!)

Etc.  So, compliance should not cost too much.

I look forward to your comments on compliance costing too much.


Rich
  

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to