Group,
I'm in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a R&TTE device doesn't need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard when the previous is withdrawn. ETSI EN 300 228 V1.7.1 loses the presumption of conformity in 2014 (December I think). Customer is installing a ZigBee component within his ITE device and wishes to apply the ZigBee transceiver compliance to his device. I've argued that revision V1.8.1 which is listed in the OJ must be applied after the DoW. Both the ZigBee component manufacturer and the test lab involved argue that once a device is "certified" that retesting is not necessary. I've double-checked the Blue Guide and I believe that their interpretation is not correct and that after the DoW the current revision listed in the OJ must be stated on the DoC. Safety in numbers, looking for a sanity check here. Thanks, Carl - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
