Richard Marshall Limited has made measuring equipment for the methods in EN55103-3 Annexe B. In 2007 we designed the test hardware and calibration hardware as in figs. B1 and B2 - which is described on our website www.design-emc.co.uk
.
Subsequently we have made several sets of test AND CALIBRATION hardware for the toroidal transformer test according to B.3(b) and B4, some of which have been supplied to customers in the USA.

John Woodgate is, of course, absolutely correct in his voltage source analysis.

We did conclude that some aspects of the design intent were not very clearly expressed in the Standard. Specifically, referring to Fig. B4, one needs to allow for the influence of the shunt impedance of the toroidal transformer primary upon the characteristics of the weighting network "L, R2".

Email off-list for full documentation and quotes!


Richard Marshall

Richard Marshall Limited
30 Ox Lane, Harpenden, Herts.
AL5 4HE UK
Phone +44 (0)1582 460815    www.design-emc.co.uk
       Member of the EMC Industry Association







----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodgate" <j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk>
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] DIN EN55103-2


In message <ce36590e.46a97%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, dated Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> writes:

"There is the unique 200 mA test method in EN 55103-2:2009, fig. B.3b) and B.4 which uses a "toroidal transformer" for injection beginning at 50 Hz."

Yes, 50 Hz to 10 kHz, not 150 kHz.

He then states:

"I do not like the method's uniqueness and the lack of an usual calibration procedure."

Tough. Most EMC test methods are 'unique'.

And he goes on to say he wants a bulk cable injection technique similar to MIL-STD-461 CS114. That's where the the thread was punted my way.

I believe the committee concerned could not find a satisfactory method of that type.

It's not too hard to inject 200 mA into a dead short, but as stated in the original post, there must be some way to bound the driving potential as well. A BCI technique at low audio frequencies is non-trivial if a potential of any magnitude must also be delivered.

I don't understand this point. There is no question of requiring an unlimited voltage. An example is given in the text of a 100 V audio-frequency supply, fed via a 4.5 kohm resistor to a transformer of voltage ratio 9:1. In parallel with the primary winding is a series network of a 6480 μH inductor and a 20.25 ohm resistor. The calibration requirement is that a short-circuit across the primary winding carries a current of, in this case, 22.22 mA, +0/-0.5 dB up to 10 kHz.

The *maximum* current injected is indeed 200 mA, but the actual current depends on the impedance of the loop, of course. This is satisfactory, because it applies also to any real-life common-mode current.

I would point out that EN 55103-2 has been in use since 1997, and the requirement has not changed. The standard will in due course be superseded by CISPR 35/EN55035, which you client may like even less.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to