The power supply PCB’s I see have holes or slots cut in them between the pointy 
conductors.  The arc occurs across the air gap.  This avoids the carbon 
tracking on the PCB condition raised below.

Gary T.

From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 9:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Spark Gap PCB Layout on AC Mains

Brian,

I am personally opposed to such an idea.  The first time I saw this was circa 
1982 on an electronic security system; designed to tie into the public 
telephone network.  The manufacturer wanted additional protection above the 
outdoor surge protector.  The design involved two parallel zig-zag traces, one 
ground and the other telephone line with alternating points in close proximity.

The problem with this is if the gaps you created ever activate, they always 
leave a permanent carbon track in the surface of the PCB.  Given adequate time 
and humidity exposure, these tracks become conductive and leakage current can 
begin to increase dramatically.  Eventually, this circuits will become 
permanently shorted.  This the main reason for evaluating comparative tracking 
index (CTI) of insulating materials along with creepage evaluation.

Best to simply use a glass or ceramic spark gaps which are inorganic and cannot 
produce carbon when arced 
(http://www.globalsources.com/manufacturers/Glass-Switching-Spark-Gap.html).


thanks, –doug

Douglas E Powell
doug...@gmail.com<mailto:doug...@gmail.com>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

From: Kunde, Brian<mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 9:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] Spark Gap PCB Layout on AC Mains

Our engineers are working on an AC Mains Distribution PCB. Like most electronic 
devices, we have seen the damage caused by lightning strikes. So we are 
increasing our creepage and clearance distances as wide as we can and still 
meet other requirements.

But no matter what spacing you design to, there is a lightning bolt out there 
that will exceed the design and it will arc somewhere. So the question came up 
to whether it makes sense to deliberately make a weak spot, or an area where 
the clearance is slightly smaller to control where a lightning/surge pulse will 
arc and/or discharge, like a Spark-Gap.

I have seen spark-gap lay outs on PC boards on I/O connectors; usually for ESD 
protection,  but not on AC Mains. Is this a bad bad idea or something worth 
doing?  Pros and Cons? Other suggestions??

Thanks to all for your help.

The Other Brian
________________________________
LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential 
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by 
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to