In message
<f3d590e5d0f24f56b4539e9d93d57...@bn1pr08mb059.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
, dated Tue, 1 Jul 2014, "Nyffenegger, Dave"
<dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com> writes:
Does this mean for a machine with two incoming supplies (separated by
some distance) a nameplate containing the ratings for both power
supplies needs to be on both nameplates adjacent both supplies? Or
only the rating for the supply adjacent the nameplate should be on the
nameplate (each nameplate would have the rating for one supply)? Seems
like the former.
It appears that the standard does not consider the case of multiple
supplies in this clause (if at all). So you have to consider what to do
and document your decision in the safety assessment document.
If you can put everything about both supplies on both nameplates, you
could hardly be criticized.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
