Hi Kevin,

Thank you for the clarifications and status of the NRTL program.  And the link 
for updates!!

Have a nice weekend!

From: Kevin Robinson [mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 3:51 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue

Hi Brian,

You stated : "Do not understand the statement that components are not covered 
by NRTL program, as the standards list does include component standards: 
www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/list_standards.html<http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/list_standards.html>"

In short, we know, and we are attempting to clean up that list to remove 
standards that should no longer be on there (or ones that never should have 
been added to the list that somehow were added).  The first of what will likely 
be many Federal Register notices dealing with the list of appropriate test 
standards:  http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=OSHA-2013-0012-0004 . 
 Many standards that could be considered component only standards do apply in 
some instances to end products (ex. motors, transformers etc.).  Internally, it 
is a discussion that we have all the time, and we do receive comments that 
recommend the addition or deletion of test standards.

Kevin Robinson
Electrical Engineer & Senior Assessor
OSHA NRTL Program
robinson.ke...@dol.gov<mailto:robinson.ke...@dol.gov>
202-693-1911<tel:202-693-1911>

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Brian Oconnell 
<oconne...@tamuracorp.com<mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com>> wrote:
As previously stated to Mr. Robinson, the industrial compliance engineering 
community very much appreciates his support of our concerns and ideas. Good 
people, this is our chance to provide some relevant industry comments. For 
example, for some product classes the default factory FUS audit interval should 
be no more than twice per year where the site has not received any variation 
notices, and there are no new product classes added to production. NRTLs should 
not be allowed to use the factory audit system as a profit center. Many other 
ideas, so let us write (link in below message).

Do not understand the statement that components are not covered by NRTL 
program, as the standards list does include component standards: 
www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/list_standards.html<http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/list_standards.html>
Perhaps there are differences in implementation. Note that a few AHJs will 
actually look up a component's 'recognition' to see if the scoped standard was 
on the NRTL list.

Brian


From: Kevin Robinson 
[mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com<mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:15 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue
I do want to chime in here on a few issues to stop any misconceptions about the 
NRTL program.  First a disclaimer, in my former life, I worked for an NRTL, I 
now work for OSHA in the office that oversees the NRTL program.
The NRTL Program applies ONLY to end products used in the workplace.  It does 
not apply to component power supplies, plastic materials used to make 
enclosures, transformers, switches etc. that are used to make up end products.  
OSHA has no authority to regulate components (as they typically can't be used 
in the workplace alone), and as a result, components are not covered under the 
NRTL Program.  It is true that many organizations recognized by OSHA as NRTLs 
do issue certifications on components, however, they are doing so outside of 
their NRTL scope of recognition, and OSHA does not oversee the activities that 
an organization we recognize does with respect to components.  A common 
complaint that I hear is the policies of some NRTLs as to the acceptance of 
component recognitions.  As the NRTL program does not cover components, and 
OSHA has no authority to require one NRTL to accept component recognition from 
another NRTL (that authority lies with other Federal agencies !
 if the policies are determined to be anti-competitive).

With that said, OSHA and the NRTL Program do recognize the importance that 
component recognitions play in product safety certifications, and we do allow 
NRTLs to accept component certifications from another NRTL provided they can 
demonstrate that they have reviewed the component certification documents to 
ensure that the component is being properly used, and that the organization 
that granted the certification had the specific standard in their NRTL scope.

As for mutual recognition of one NRTL's certification for an end product, 
again, OSHA does not have the authority to require one NRTL to accept 
certifications from another NRTL.  We do allow this, and we have established 
some guidelines if an NRTL does accept certifications from another NRTL, but we 
can not require an NRTL to do this.  Fortunately, it is very rare when an end 
product certified by NRTL #1 is then submitted to NRTL #2.

John Tyra was sharing his experiences when working a an NRTL 20 years ago.  I 
can say that times have changed.  20 years ago, the NRTL program was only 5 
years old, and the assessors were borrowed from other federal agencies.  The 
only guidance that OSHA or NRTLs had was what was written in the regulations 
(29 CFR 1910.7) which provides a very high level approach to the program.  The 
NRTL Program within OSHA is a very small group (we currently have a staff of 4 
people), 50% of whom are ex-NRTL employees, so we now have the expertise to dig 
deeper into the capabilities.  In the late 1990's, OSHA did publish additional 
guidance for the NRTLs, although, there has been only minor updates since that 
time.  I am very happy to say that we will soon (hopefully this week) be 
releasing portions of an updated draft directive (OSHA Policies and procedures) 
for the NRTL program that align our requirements with ISO 17025 & 17065.  On 
October 22, we will be holding a stakeholder mee!
 ting to discuss which direction to take the program in the future, and whether 
those changes will require rule making which can be a lengthy process.  Some of 
the topics presented in this thread will be discussed at this meeting.  While 
registration for the meeting has officially closed, we so still have space 
available for those who are interested in attending as an observer.  Details on 
the meeting are available here: 
http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=OSHA-2013-0028.  If you are 
interested in attending this meeting, please send an e-mail to 
nrtlprog...@dol.gov<mailto:nrtlprog...@dol.gov> .  Future updates to the 
program, including the draft directive will be posted here: 
https://www.osha.gov/nrtlpi/index.html

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Kevin Robinson
Electrical Engineer & Senior Assessor
OSHA NRTL Program
robinson.ke...@dol.gov<mailto:robinson.ke...@dol.gov>
202-693-1911<tel:202-693-1911>


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:15 PM, 
jral...@productsafetyinc.com<mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com> 
<jral...@productsafetyinc.com<mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com>> wrote:
Hi Rich,

Yes, I would agree.  Not sure how or if we'll ever get there, but if an NRTL is 
covered by OSHA for a Standard, all NRTLs should accept their mark and not have 
to repeat any testing.  How do we get there if the Standard itself leaves too 
much room for interpretation??  If all the Standards were Hazard Based (I know 
you'll love this), do we have a chance of getting to harmonized 
interpretations??

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org<mailto:ri...@ieee.org>]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:10 PM
To: jral...@productsafetyinc.com<mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com>; 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue


Hi John:


On 9/4/2014 8:52 AM, 
jral...@productsafetyinc.com<mailto:jral...@productsafetyinc.com> wrote:
> Is it that NRTLs don't trust each other's data?  Or is the pink elephant in 
> the room revenue and market share??
The issue is revenue (profits).

If the NRTL performs ALL of the tests, the revenue is higher and the profits 
higher.

They use the argument that the NRTL must KNOW that the equipment is safe 
through their own measurements.  They cannot be held responsible for tests that 
are done by another NRTL.

On the other hand, some NRTLs do accept tests and data from other NRTLs.  And, 
some NRTLs have MRAs (to reduce time and costs for a client).


Best regards,
Rich

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to