John 

I agree that huge progress has been made over the last 3 decades in particular, 
but I do think that issues like this (and I'm sure there are others) do need to 
be addressed if we are to make further significant progress.

Therefore I think that point should be made to the chairmen of all the relevant 
TC's, and thus:
- the TC's which are effectively "in disagreement" over their definitions and 
requirements for "the same things" should be clearly identified ;
- the areas of disagreement, and the reasons why, should be identified;
- these should be rationalised and "equalised" -  but, if that does not resolve 
the issues then some "head-banging" (probably lead by the IEC & CENELEC) needs 
to take place to sort them out.

That being my view (and that - like yourself! - having been in the regs & stds 
business for very many years), do ANY OF THE "SIGNIFICANT" CONTRIBUTORS TO THE 
FORUM (notably the chairmen of relevant TC's‼‼) have some sensible suggestions 
as to how these progress towards these objectives could be achieved?

NB: for my part I would suggest that this issue should be raised at the next 
IEC &/or CENELEC top-level steering committee meetings for them to identify and 
chart some possible ways forward from where we are today.

John Allen


-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] 
Sent: 16 January 2015 22:06
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] safety distances in DC/DC

In message
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAEAAAACX17u6mfoRCrb33l
LH5RdgBAAAAAA==@blueyonder.co.uk>, dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015, John Allen 
<john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:

>And, in that case, what would you suggest might be done about improving 
>the situation?

I don't have a solution. Do you?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk When I turn 
my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and 
Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to