Hello Scott  - What Energy Star/DoE standards are you referring to?

Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications
(w) 303-706-5467
(c) 303-204-2974
(t) 3032042...@vtext.com
(e) charles.gra...@echostar.com
(e2) chasgra...@gmail.com

From: Scott Aldous [mailto:00000220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:06 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] USB Mains Outlet sockets

Hi John,

Interesting topic.

Yes, these are offered in the US as well. Here's one example:

http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1693478.pdf

According to the datasheet, this product is UL Listed to UL 498 and UL 1310. 
The online cert directory has this under UL file number E2186. The UL category 
for this file is RTRT, which typically includes UL 498 only. UL 1310 is the 
standard for class 2 power supplies. For permanently connected units, the 
requirement for a disconnect device is that the instruction manual indicate 
that a disconnect device shall be incorporated in the field wiring - clause 
71.2g). I imagine the branch circuit breaker is considered acceptable as a 
disconnect device in this case.

I didn't take the time to search further so don't know if certification to UL 
1310 is common for this type of product. If someone at UL judged that it was 
appropriate, then it well may be since I would guess that most receptacles (if 
not all) for the US market are going to have UL Listing to meet NEC 
requirements. Maybe there has been internal discussion at UL regarding whether 
UL 60950-1 is applicable - I don't know.

For energy efficiency, the datasheet makes no reference to efficiency 
requirements, but does include some power consumption ratings. The no load 
power consumption stated does not meet guidelines from Energy Star or the US 
DOE. It stands to reason that these devices should meet all requirements 
applicable to traditional power supplies. I would think that these would have 
even more impact on energy consumption since they will likely almost never be 
disconnected from power. The current regulations were not written with this 
type of product in mind, so I would guess that they might slip under the radar 
until formal judgments start to emerge.

On the restriction on insulation resistance testing, my guess is that the 
product that has this restriction may have MOVs or other transient suppression 
device that wouldn't be happy with a high voltage test. The datasheet I linked 
to above indicates 2kV dielectric withstand, so maybe it doesn't have the same 
issue. If there is an installation code in the UK that requires compatibility 
with regular insulation resistance testing, then I would think these types of 
products need to be able to withstand such testing or have a means to 
disconnect to allow the test to be run.

Whether ITE, it's hard to imagine how these products could be considered exempt 
from CE marking.

I am curious to know what others have to say.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Pearson, John 
<john.pear...@polycom.com<mailto:john.pear...@polycom.com>> wrote:
Here is a Friday discussion topic for you guys.

In the UK we are seeing a plethora of aftermarket 250v AC mains outlet sockets 
which are supplied for installation, it seems by the homeowner, (this has been 
a traditional practice over here.  In the US I understand that this happens 
less).  The advantage of these sockets is that they also give you 2 USB 
charging ports in the wall as well as two socket outlets.  I see large 
distributors (Screwfix, Amazon.co.uk<http://Amazon.co.uk> and Ebuyer for e.g.) 
selling several 
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=lap+mains+socket&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-GB:IE-Address&ie=&oe=&gfe_rd=cr&ei=edoCVauNDquD8Qekq4HgBQ&gws_rd=ssl#rls=com.microsoft:en-GB:IE-Address&tbm=shop&q=usb+mains+power+socket+outlet
.  Look out for an explosion of these items is my suspicion as the idea of 
getting rid of plug in USB chargers is very appealing, even to me!


Questions from the compliance side

Energy Efficiency
Single rail PSU’s are subject to mandatory Energy Efficiency marking and 
performance.  All the units I have seen thus far do not mark or declare any 
performance figures.  The PSU being wired into the mains does not to my mind 
preclude these products from compliance with the Eco-design Directive and 
278/2009 specifically, or am I missing something?

Safety of USB port
All of the devices I have seen are stamped with EN 60950-1 on the back thus 
appear to be purporting compliance this std.  Not seen any DoC’s.  I do not 
understand how they can meet the Disconnect Device requirements of CL 3.4 by 
design unless the mains switches are the disconnect device.  I see however that 
the switches only turn off the mains to the traditional BS1363 sockets.  Any 
thoughts?

Certification
Several of these items claim ASTA certification.  I wonder what ASTA certified 
them to.  I suspect not EN 60950-1.  Is that not misleading?

Insulation test
At least one of these devices states “Do not Megger” the device.  Apparently 
the USB charge circuitry cannot stand high voltage and would likely or possibly 
fail.  As it is recommend in the UK that home wiring be regularly checked for 
insulation issues is this product “fit for purpose” ?

CE marking
Several of these are not CE marked.  See this 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Connekt-Gear-Power-Socket-Charging-white/dp/B00KO1KDN4

Rather bizarrely one supplier with a seemingly non CE marked product issued 
this http://www.groupgear.co.uk/catalogue/27-2000-Counterfeit-warning.pdf

Does outlet sockets require CE marking by the placer on the market and if they 
also incorporate a PSU for charging ITE product doesn’t it become an ITE 
product itself subject to EMCD and LVD and thus require CE marking for that 
purpose also?



All this said it seems that they are getting great reviews but likely from the 
user benefit rather than the above

Look forward to interesting responses.

John

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
&LT;emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>&GT;

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas &LT;sdoug...@ieee.org<mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>&GT;
Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>&GT;

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>&GT;
David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>&GT;



--
Scott Aldous
Compliance Engineer
Google
650-253-1994
scottald...@google.com<mailto:scottald...@google.com>
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org<mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to