There are 3 additional requirements as compared with existing one. The technical documentation shall include an adequate analysis and assessment of the risk(s). What is objective and scope for these? Do these analysis and assessment refer to 3rd party verification of compliance with applicable standard(s) or are they on top of compliance with applicable safety standard(s)?
In DoC, a suitable identification of the product should be included - a colour image of the product could be employed. Is there any guideline for this product image? One exterior front view photo like one on front cover of catalogue or a series of different views of the product? Article 6, point 4 regarding manufacturers’ obligations, to protect the health and safety of consumers, carry out sample testing of electrical equipment made available on the market. Does it mean the sample testing, i.e.. dielectric strength test, earth continuity test, etc. is taken in production at factory or in warehouse of destined market? Your guidance is highly appreciated! Regards, Scott - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>