Re the quoted text. Once you get the idea of making the project leader
internally responsible for compliance, it naturally follows that the
responsibility propagates up the management chain, i.e. the VP
Engineering's head is on the block if there is a serious compliance
issue in the field.
'On-time, within-budget, compliant' is not an 'any two of three' option.
'Late' and 'more costly' don't kill people, 'non-compliant' can, and does.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-09-14 22:00, Ken Javor wrote:
And that is due to there being a strong line of demarcation between
the management responsibility to deliver a product on time and within
budget vs. making sure the thing is safe.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
