At a previous employer ran into the issue as Doug describes, using
different ESD Guns at different labs. Cal reports showed the ESD Guns with
the worst correlation issues were at opposite ends of the permissible
di/dt. Other than correlation issues and potential embarrassment of not
having adequate margin to account for the variability. Not sure how big an
issue it really is. Really depends upon how much it would end up costing to
make the correlation better. Doubling the price of an ESD Gun wouldn't be
worth it IMHO, however 10% increase would IMO be money well spent. YMMV.




On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:19 PM Monrad Monsen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Does anyone have any stories that can be shared of a product getting a
> different ESD test result when changing the brand/model of ESD simulator?
>
>
>
> I am a member of the US Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for CISPR/I
> international standards committee (Electromagnetic compatibility of
> information technology equipment, multimedia equipment and receivers).
> There is a proposal that SC77B begin work on changes to IEC 61000-4-2 (ESD)
> to improve the ESD waveform verification (some call this “calibration”)
> because under today’s rules different simulators create different levels of
> high frequency signal content which some believe is the primary reason for
> different test results.  Some believe that the IEC 61000-4-2 waveform
> requirement fails to include any evaluation of the slope (dV/dt or dI/dt)
> of the impulse, and that uncontrolled parameter directly affects spectral
> content.  I would like to know if anyone has experienced any actual ESD
> test result consistency when using different Brand/model ESD simulators
> even though they are all calibrated simulators under today’s rules.
>
>
>
> I admit that our company uses the same brand & model ESD simulator as
> local labs, so I have never observed this issue myself.  My initial
> preference is to not add cost to testing and avoid forcing labs to buy new
> ESD simulators, but perhaps this cost is warranted if there are actual wide
> variations in ESD test results depending on the brand of ESD simulator.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Monrad Monsen | Hardware Compliance Strategist
> Phone: +1.303.272.9612
> Oracle Market Access & Hardware Compliance Strategy
> 500 Eldorado Blvd | Broomfield, CO 80021
>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
> [email protected]&GT;
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas &LT;[email protected]&GT;
> Mike Cantwell &LT;[email protected]&GT;
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher &LT;[email protected]&GT;
> David Heald &LT;[email protected]&GT;
>


-- 
John Merrill
Compliance Manager
Hayward Industries, Inc
North Kingstown, RI 02851

-- 
             ********************DISCLAIMER********************
The 
information contained in this e-mail message, and any attached file, may be 
CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only.  Distribution, 
duplication, or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein 
by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended 
addressee, please notify the sender immediately and then delete and discard 
all copies of the e-mail.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to