Thanks guys.

 

I checked out the actual case yesterday and was told that the reason for
observing QP for a longer time was that the product had used a spread
spectrum technique.

 

 

Best regards Amund

 

 

 

Fra: Paasche, Dieter 
Sendt: 6. desember 2021 16:35
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Amund Westin <am...@westin-emission.no>
Emne: RE: [PSES] Max Hold Quasi-peak ?

 

Hi, 

 

I agree with the statements mentioned. It depends on the nature of the
disturbance and you would have to find out what is happening during that
period of time. I would also suggest to review CISPR 16-2-1, specifically to
the definition of continuous disturbance. 

 

Section 3 continuous disturbance

 

RF disturbance with a duration of more than 200 ms at the IF-output of a
measuring receiver,

which causes a deflection on the meter of a measuring receiver in quasi-peak
detection mode

which does not decrease immediately

 

Section 6.5 Interpretation of measuring results. 

 

6.5 Interpretation of measuring results

6.5.1 Continuous disturbance

The following steps shall be applied when interpreting the results for
continuous disturbance

measurements:

a) At each frequency for which the level of disturbance is close to the
limit and not steady,

the reading on the measuring receiver is observed for at least 15 s for each
measurement;

the highest readings shall be recorded. Some product standards allow the
exclusion of

isolated clicks, which shall be ignored (e.g. CISPR 14-1).

 

There are more conditions in this sections. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

 

        



    


Dieter Paasche

Senior Product Developer

Electrical / EMC Compliance

 


 <mailto:dieter.paas...@christedigital.com>
dieter.paas...@christedigital.com
Work: (519) 744-8005 Ext. 7211
 <http://www.christiedigital.com/> www.christiedigital.com

        
 <https://www.christiedigital.com/> 


809 Wellington St. N.
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 4Y7 Canada

 <https://www.facebook.com/christiedigital>
<https://twitter.com/christiedigital>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/christie-digital-systems/>
<https://www.instagram.com/christiedigital/>
<https://www.youtube.com/user/christieDigital> 

 

 

This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential.  Any
unauthorized use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail or telephone and delete it and any attachments from your computer
system and records.

 

From: Charles Grasso <charles.gra...@dish.com
<mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com> > 
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2021 10:08 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Max Hold Quasi-peak ?

 

        
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.

 

Interesting topic!   

 

Completely agree with Brent!. 

 

I would only add the "quality" of the signal can also contribute to the
variation - by that I mean if there

 is any kind of modulation on the signal then that will contribute to the
measurement difficulties.

 It is also not unusual for a lab to sit on a signal if the signal has a
noted time variance 

(this is from experience).

 

 

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 11:46 AM Amund Westin < wrote:

 This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org <mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org>  

 

Some weeks ago I went to a test lab as an observer on a CE marking project
(IT product). 

I participated on the radiated emission testing and some frequencies were
above the limit line during the scan (peak measurement). Later on, the
Quasi-Peak measurement lowered the values significant and therefore with the
result Passed.

Later on, I was told that they continued the testing by 10-15 minutes and
was logging the maximum Quasi Peak value (repetitive QP meas) on spike with
the highest value. During these 15 minutes, one or two QP measurement was
above the limit and the result was changed from Passed to Failed.

I have not seen this test procedure before. I'm familiar with just one QP
measurement on each frequency and not Max Hold QP on each for 10-15 minutes.


Anyone who have experienced the same? Is it a CISPR procedure or just some
overzealous lab engineers?

 

Best regards

Amund

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
&LT;emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> &GT;

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Femc-pstc.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%
7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C
0%7C637744000966549548%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=kuw10TXjY8Zd7h1NTXKzU6sd5
JWd%2BWDHZ%2Bp4lN34bLE%3D&reserved=0> 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fproduct-co
mpliance.oc.ieee.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%
7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C
0%7C637744000966549548%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=gzrgLwNMqUL7XRh7q4KJB4AiZ
cS7bFm1pqQE89LgR9Q%3D&reserved=0>  can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%7C29476a3fedd
5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C0%7C637744000
966559543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTi
I6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=RYvso41YLm6G%2F9eHk%2BwnS64iO8PZslwb3F
jeLOCtffs%3D&reserved=0> 
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Flist.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%7C29
476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C0%7C
637744000966559543%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=6f67XGuubNvy1Ae36RPInWgSk3kY8
CB1yF44sQri%2BX4%3D&reserved=0> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Flistrules.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com
%7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7
C0%7C637744000966569545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=JTgcRjzRGGS89Sqv87GlARN4
tPZvqvfAduu%2BzvTLt84%3D&reserved=0>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas &LT;sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> &GT;
Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> &GT; 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> &GT;
David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> &GT; 




 

-- 

Charles Grasso

Dish Technologies

 (c) 303-204-2974

(h) 303-317-5530

(e ) charles.gra...@dish.com <mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com> 

(e2) chasgra...@gmail.com <mailto:chasgra...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Femc-pstc.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%
7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C
0%7C637744000966569545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=6O%2BZTE8R0uUwaWJJs6XfA6i
iFkgCrpSSAAosd55nGd8%3D&reserved=0> 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fproduct-co
mpliance.oc.ieee.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%
7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C
0%7C637744000966579533%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV
2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=L8TlK%2Fe7uIZjKqFt131iNNG
qWvyI7m0F%2BZZsoWaunzw%3D&reserved=0>  can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%7C29476a3fedd
5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C0%7C637744000
966579533%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTi
I6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=cy0Ch2tPxkWdavnLijeNR8kdntYsIv9WBq1pm6
I6sfY%3D&reserved=0> 
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Flist.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com%7C29
476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7C0%7C
637744000966589529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=YtfSXtGqD1GO%2FFW09oiFjNDYCsz
n7aNn770otGthlGs%3D&reserved=0> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ieee-p
ses.org%2Flistrules.html&data=04%7C01%7CDieter.Paasche%40christiedigital.com
%7C29476a3fedd5450ac08508d9b8ca3a04%7Cdf46f062ad2c407688e6c675c789a0d8%7C0%7
C0%7C637744000966589529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Had2kPPZrcOzrj9MQQOCTfjQ
%2F6UNE6LltTY7fUHNiEw%3D&reserved=0>  

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org <mailto:sdoug...@ieee.org> >
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org <mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> >
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com <mailto:dhe...@gmail.com> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to