FCC Part B has nothing to do with immunity. It protects radio receivers.  20 
V/m simply means they are taking into account higher power or closer rf 
transmitters. Your cell phone, transmitting at 0.5 W, theoretically can 
generate 5 V/m a meter away.  That will scale up in closer, although the scale 
factor breaks down for very close separations.

 

Since the typical limits are 1, 3, and 10 V/m, It may be difficult to find 
someone who can do this. One (long shot) hope is if they define the peak of the 
modulation as 20 V/m, instead of as 36 V/m, then a facility that can do 10 V/m 
(peak of the modulation envelope being 18 V/m per 61000-4-3) may be able to do 
20 V/m, peak as well.

 

-- 

Ken Javor

(256) 650-5261

 

From: Brian Gregory <brian_greg...@netzero.net>
Reply-To: Brian Gregory <brian_greg...@netzero.net>
Date: Friday, July 21, 2023 at 11:44 AM
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] Immunity test field strength, residential setting

 

 Hello colleagues, 

 

We are building EV Chargers for residential markets (not just US) and one of 
the safety applicable standards is UL 2231-2.  It calls out  IEC 61000-4-3 for 
immunity testing parameters, which states a requirement for a field strength of 
20V/m.  Our EMC expert says typically testing is "done at 3 Vrms, which is 
standard for most products in residential environments."   He can only test up 
to 10V, and we're hearing the same from an overseas lab to whom our 
manufacturer refers.  

 

Does FCC Part B have guidelines for field strength we can cite?   Can some 
offer this "DC guy" (aka, 60 Hz) a quick definition of what the 20V/m 
represents?

 

I'm guessing 20 V/m is for higher density commercial applications, aka charging 
stations, so we probably need an exception for residential.  

 

Thank you!

 

Colorado Brian 
720-450-4933

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All 
emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/ 

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org 

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to