There are, but 20 V/m still is a very high value. One wouldn't expect a transmitter to be used in a car while it is on charge.

On 2023-07-24 22:57, Jim Bacher, WB8VSU wrote:
Wi-Fi and cell phones are not the only transmitters near cars. There are police, fire and ham radio transceivers in cars. Some of which are on gain antennas and can be remotely accessed to transmit. Not to mention hand held transceivers that might walk by.

Jim, WB8VSU


On July 24, 2023 5:51:27 PM Brian Gregory <brian_greg...@netzero.net> wrote:

The reference for 20 V/m to EV chargers comes from UL 2231-2.  This is not a medical standard, but Annex A does call out the medical standard 60601-1-2 as a reference, as well as CENELEC 50204.  We can't figure out why;  cell phones produce less than half that, and our WiFi transmitter is probably representative, and is rated well under 1 W.  I could see a higher immunity standard as needed for commercial environments, say in a bank of 4-5 chargers. Following along in 61000-4-3, we agree with John that residential applications are clearly best matched to the definition for Class 2 environment, and the table in Clause 5 says the limits for Class 2 equipment is 3 V/m.  20 V/m does not show up in Clause 5 of 61000-4-3 for any class. So, I've should to reach out to a UL standards group and find out if this is really necessary for residential applications.   Our local lab can't do more than 10, and an overseas affiliated lab is similarly limited.  I'd like to know were this requirement comes from.   This is more a question for EV Charging safety than a mainstream EMC question. As a backup, I could request a comment to Ken's point is if they define the peak of the modulation as 20 V/m.  I don't know where these are defined.
Thanks for all the detailed replies!
Colorado Brian
720-450-4933


---------- Original Message ----------
From: John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk>
To: Brian Gregory <brian_greg...@netzero.net>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Immunity test field strength, residential setting
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:05:59 +0100

61000-4-3 is a Basic Standard. It does not specify test levels but indicates possible test levels. You need to look in detail at Clause 5, but look at these words:

/Product committees shall select the appropriate test level for each frequency range //needing to be tested as well as the frequency ranges./

The residential environment is usually designated Class 2 (see Annex E of the standard), which calls for 3 V/m.

======================================================================================
Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

I hear, and I forget. I see, and I remember. I do, and I understand. Xunzi (340 - 245 BC)
On 2023-07-21 17:44, Brian Gregory wrote:

     Hello colleagues,
    We are building EV Chargers for residential markets (not just US)
    and one of the safety applicable standards is UL 2231-2.  It
    calls out  IEC 61000-4-3 for immunity testing parameters, which
    states a requirement for a field strength of 20V/m.  Our EMC
    expert says typically testing is "done at 3 Vrms, which is
    standard for most products in residential environments."   He can
    only test up to 10V, and we're hearing the same from an overseas
    lab to whom our manufacturer refers.
    Does FCC Part B have guidelines for field strength we can cite? 
     Can some offer this "DC guy" (aka, 60 Hz) a quick definition of
    what the 20V/m represents?
    I'm guessing 20 V/m is for higher density commercial
    applications, aka charging stations, so we probably need an
    exception for residential.
    Thank you!
    Colorado Brian
    720-450-4933
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
    emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send
    your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are
    archived and searchable on the web at:
    https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

    Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
    Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including
    how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
    List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

    For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
    Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

    For policy questions, send mail to:
    Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
    https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1


------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html>
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to