Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Jon Elson wrote:
> 
>>Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>>
>>>Jon Elson wrote:
>>>
>>>>OK, same problem as my PPMC line, then.  But, 1 KHz isn't fast 
>>>>enough?  Or, does handling the Mesa's 72 I/O points take a lot 
>>>>longer than my 24?
>>>
>>>I haven't done speed tests of the 7i43 with hostmot2 for a while, but i 
>>>think low ones of KHz update rates are reasonable.  Say 1-4 KHz or so. 
>>>That's for reading all the encoders, stepgens, and gpios, and writing 
>>>all the pwmgens, stepgens, and gpios.
>>
>>OK, that is reasonably close to what I'm getting, considering 
>>the greater I/O points.  I can run up to 10 KHz with one of my 
>>UPC or USC boards with on-motherboard PP on a 600 MHz pentium 
>>II.  I can go to 5 KHz with 2 UPC's, so that's 8 axes 16 digital 
>>outs and 31 digital ins, on the same machine.  I can probably go 
>>to 10 KHz with 2 boards with a PCI parallel port and a little 
>>faster CPU.
> 
> 
> That 1-4 KHz figure is an old measurement I remembered for 4-channel 
> servo control (on the 7i43 board): read 4 encoder counts (counted by the 
> FPGA), do 4-channel pid in emc2, then write 4 PWMs.
> 
> I ran some tests tonight on my development machine, a single-processor 
> Celeron running at 2.6 GHz.  Please remember that the driver is still 
> under development and basically not optimized at all: these figures may 
> change in the future.
> 
> The values for "time" reported below is the average time taken by the 
> function (measurement is approximate average of 10 or so random 
> samples).  The values for "tmax" is the longest time taken by the 
> function after a few minutes of runtime.  All times in microseconds.
> 
> 
> 7i43:
> 
>      pet_watchdog (or else it bites) time=47, tmax=57
> 
>      read (4 encoders, 4 steppers, 48 gpio inputs) time=245, tmax=260
>      write (4 pwmgens, 4 steppers, 48 gpio outputs) time=235, tmax=637
> 
>      read_gpio (48 gpio inputs) time=37, tmax=49
>      write_gpio (48 gpio outputs) time=35, tmax=46
> 
> 
> So if we're just talking about reading & writing gpios, you can do that 
> at about 7 KHz and still have 50% of your CPU time left over for other 
> things.  Or 2 KHz if you want the watchdog enabled.
> 
> 
> If I disable the steppers on the 7i43 (with config="num_steppers=0") and 
> run it with 4 servo channels (and 24 accessible GPIOs), I get these figures:
> 
>      read time=191, tmax=203
>      write time=190, tmax=239
> 
> That's about 1 KHz.
> 
Very interesting!  I wonder if you can improve this by 
streamlining the driver.  I can do 4 axes on my USC or UPC board 
at about 100 us, on a 600 MHz Pentium II through the motherboard 
parallel port.  A safe 5 KHz.
> 
> And just for fun, the numbers for the 5i20:
> 
>      pet_watchdog (or else it bites) time=6, tmax=13
> 
>      read (8 encoders, 4 steppers, 72 gpio inputs) time=52, tmax=62
>      write (8 pwmgens, 4 steppers, 72 gpio outputs) time=15, tmax=27
> 
>      read_gpio (72 gpio inputs) time=13, tmax=42
>      write_gpio (72 gpio outputs) time=5, tmax=12
> 
> 

Well, it certainly shows the effect of the parallel port on the 
7i43!

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to