John Kasunich wrote:
> Jon Elson wrote:
> 
>>Chris Radek wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:35:27AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>OHHHhhhh. HIGHLY dangerous.  It writes 0x80 to the I/O port 
>>>>0x402 above that address you specify.  If you don't specify 
>>>>anything, it probably defaults to zero, so it writes to I/O port 
>>>
>>>This write should be added to the driver.  If it needs to be optional,
>>>it should be a load-time parameter for the driver so the user can
>>>change it in the hal file.
>>>
> 
> 
> Note the second part of Chris's statement:  "it should be a load time
> parameter for the driver".
> 
OOps, I DID miss that!  Yes, now it makes some sense to do this.
I will try to put this in in the next couple days.
> I agree that writing to any address by DEFAULT can be dangerous and is
> stupid.  But having a load time parameter such as:
> 
> loadrt ppmc dangerous_pci_setup_hack=1
What the heck should we call it?  Some people have chafed at the 
name "pcisetup".  Any suggestions?  I'm thinking, maybe, 
something like "force_EPP".  How does that sound as the 
parameter name?

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to