For a quick (hobby) comparison - I have a 2'X4' homemade router table.
Using a low cost controller card (HobbyCNC) through the parallel port, I can
drive three axis powered by 200oz-in stepper motors. This setup can drive
the steppers to over 400ipm, but my mechanical limitations (binding, poor
building, crud,etc) keeps me at ~90-100 ipm on the X and Y.  Add
microstepping (1/4) and I run at 60 IPM.

I use 8 or 9 wires from the cable.  With this setup I do NOT control
Spindle (on/off switch)
Spindle speed
Homing
Limits
Position feedback.

If I added all those, I would quickly eat up the available cabling.  For me,
the set up is fine - its a hobby machine (my wife wonders if I will make
anything with it).

It sounds like the Anilam control had a few bells and whistles that are
easily handled by EMC.  But from all I read on the numerous emails and
forums, for the little extra cost up front, it sounds like you would be
better off going with an FPGA card and letting your machine run closer to
its mechanical limits and not those of the computer (anilam or EMC thru the
parallel port).

my 2 cents.

Brian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to