Ok, now I got it, but I am convinced that it would not work in joint
mode anyway. Please correct me, if I am wrong. Each joint is
completely independent in joint mode, AFAIK EMC is built so that
assignements between joints and axes are ignored in joint mode, so
also Your suggestion with use of U axis would not work, because, as
You said, in homing U is homed separately, so it is treated as
separate joint in joint mode.

 There would be an option to modify the LPT cable so that X step and X
dir signals go to 2 pins and so that 2 drives receive those signals.
But this option automatically excludes the possibility of homing each
gantry side separately.
But I need separate control of each gantry side so that machine is
squared and kept straight each time.

Viesturs

2010/9/4 Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com>:
> homing has nothing to do with the switching - it was just part of the
> explanation of what I would do
> I would not set up the kinematics to drive the second X axis motor. I would
> set it up to follow the first X axis motor. Then the movement mode would
> make no difference.
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Viesturs Lācis 
> <viesturs.la...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> >
>> > hope this helps
>> > thanks
>> > Stuart
>> >
>>
>> No offence, but it didn't :))
>> I have joint0 and joint1 explicitly assigned to X axis in my kinematics
>> module.
>> In joint mode each joint (motor) is moved independently, no
>> assignements to any axis are in effect in joint mode. That is why it
>> is called "joint mode".
>>
>> I think that my current homing works very well and please accept my
>> apologies, but I do not understand, what does homing have to do with
>> EMC switching to joint mode on its own.
>>
>> Viesturs
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>>
>> Show off your parallel programming skills.
>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> dos centavos
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to