On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:18:49 +0100, you wrote: >On 20 July 2011 15:55, Colin K <cwk....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Now, let's say that, with tool 2 in the spindle, I jog up so I can just >> slide a 2" 123 block under the tool. This would give me Z2. If I execute M6 >> T1 G43, the Z-axis DRO should change to a value like 2.250" to reflect that >> T1 is about .250" shorter (less stickout) than T2. > >Yes, that is what should happen. >Out of interest, does it take the correct value with a tiny jog? I >think I have noticed that the DRO sometimes doesn't seem to update >with non-motion changes. (Actually, I think flicking from preview to >DRO tabs forces and update)
Dunno about emc's tool offset behaviour but Mach doesn't apply the offset until the next G1 or G0 move following the M6 line. That is by design. Perhaps EMC behaves in the same way? Steve Blackmore -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Tips for Better Web Security Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include: Web security, SSL, hacker attacks & Denial of Service (DoS), private keys, security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users