> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Viesturs LÄcis > <viesturs.la...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> 2012/2/8 Erik Christiansen <dva...@internode.on.net>: >> > >> > Experiments with new grammars are only to see if there are benefits to >> > _some_ users in having a more explicit input syntax, which is then >> > converted to gcode. >> >> Thank You for clarification! >> I am all right now :) >> > My comments were made to point to a possible language to > explore/use/develop during the benefits determination process. > The current gcode capability would not be rendered unusable. The new > language would be along side it as an option. > > Again - shamelessly > My interest is having a full free APT system on Linux. Inclusion in > LinuxCNC would cause development - voila - APT on Linux. :) > I would be willing/able to contribute to the process in some manner. I > don't care so much about the 'free' description, I want APT on linux.
Hi Stuart. You have seen this page, haven't you? http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AptProgrammingForEMC - Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
