I get some new corrected ones on here after a bit. On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:28 AM, John Thornton <bjt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The top part just has some counterbores for SHCS's. And yes I agree the > part should be modeled with a radius on inside corners as allowed. > > John > > On 4/17/2012 8:13 AM, andy pugh wrote: > > On 17 April 2012 14:02, Erik Friesen<e...@aercon.net> wrote: > >> Everything else ended up with 1/8 radius. > > In that case you need to draw it with a 1/8" radius, or the machine > > shops will quote for the part as-drawn, and you will be paying a lot > > more for difficult machining that you don't need. > > > > I see, for example, that you don't have hexagonal recesses in your > > part, but they exist in the model. > > > > If you want to keep nuts captive then a rounded triangle will work > > nearly as well, but can be much more easily machined. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users