I get some new corrected ones on here after a bit.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:28 AM, John Thornton <bjt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The top part just has some counterbores for SHCS's.  And yes I agree the
> part should be modeled with a radius on inside corners as allowed.
>
> John
>
> On 4/17/2012 8:13 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 17 April 2012 14:02, Erik Friesen<e...@aercon.net>  wrote:
> >> Everything else ended up with 1/8 radius.
> > In that case you need to draw it with a 1/8" radius, or the machine
> > shops will quote for the part as-drawn, and you will be paying a lot
> > more for difficult machining that you don't need.
> >
> > I see, for example, that you don't have hexagonal recesses in your
> > part, but they exist in the model.
> >
> > If you want to keep nuts captive then a rounded triangle will work
> > nearly as well, but can be much more easily machined.
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to