andy pugh wrote:
> On 15 July 2012 14:45, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> But the internal calculations for velocity etc are done at the servo
>> threads granularity of nominally 1 millisecond.  So there is no chance of
>> the figures being accurate when the count may be up to a millisecond old.
>>     
>
> The counts shouldn't be more than a thread-dither old (10uS or so).
> The calculation function reads the latest count from the base thread
> functions (possibly a base-thread old).
>
> The FPGA in the Pico card being discussed here ought to make an even
> better job at being up-to-date.
>   
The Pico Systems USC does not have this feature (timestamping of encoder
count arrival).  The UPC does.  The position CAN be thought of as "stale"
as the encoder gives no info between counts.  So, if it crossed the boundary
to a new position a while ago, you have no way to know how close it is to
crossing the next boundary.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to