On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 01:15 -0600, a...@conceptmachinery.com wrote:
> problem with reprap is that their main idea is to make cheap machine 
> -under $ 1000- but not real rapid prototype machine. 

Although I don't have any inside information, I believe the reason DIY
3D printers have (or don't have) specific features is that most of the
original patents remain in effect.

These seem to be the fundamental patents:

http://softsolder.com/2012/06/29/fundamental-3d-printing-patents/

The patent documents include links to more recent patents that refer
back to them, so you can devote as much time as you wish to determining
that the neat idea *you* just had has already been invented, patented,
and reduced to practice. It worked that way for me, anyhow... [grin]

Although converting a CNC mill to a 3D printer seems attractive, I think
the second-order effects will make it impractical: speed, cleanliness,
ambient environment, stuff like that. As one of my managers put it: "You
must first decide whether you're designing a waffle iron or a toaster."

Which is not to say that you can't do it for yourself. What you almost
certainly *can't* do is invent a commercially viable 3D printer and sell
it with impunity...

-- 
Ed
http://softsolder.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to